1 International Journal of Cosmetic Surgery
www.ijcs.org
| IACS: Become a Member | IBCS: Apply for a Board Certification |
 Download VideosOnline Live SurgeryOrder CD
  
  
  
  
ISSN:
1728-4643
   
   
ISSN:
1728-4643

 Home | Societies | Surgeons | Opinions | Journals | About IJCS | F.A.Q.

 
 IJCS / Year: 2001 / Volume 1 - Number 4 / Publications to EXODERM LIFT:
Home | Table of contents | Print this Page
Title: Whether to Peel or Laser for Acne Scarring and Hyperpigmentation
by Yoram Fintzi, M.D., Haim Kaplan, M.D., and Marina Landau, M.D.
Pages: 54 - 61
 
 

Whether to Peel or Laser
for Acne Scarring and Hyperpigmentation

by Yoram Fintzi, M.D., Haim Kaplan, M.D., and Marina Landau, M.D.

Abstract

Introduction: The correction of acne scarring continues to be a challenge for physicians despite the variety of peeling methods. A comparison of the efficacy and side effects of different techniques in the same patient is not usually feasible. The authors have used two different techniques for acne scarring and hyperpigmentation in the same patient to compare the two methods. 
Materials and Methods:
Simultaneous treatment by two different methods was used in the same patient who had acne scars and hyperpigmentation. Each half of the face was treated simultaneously by laser on one side and phenol-based (Exoderm) peel on the other side. Pretreatment and posttreatment biopsy samples were obtained. 
Results: More profound effects on acne scarring were shown on the Exoderm-treated side. There were more abundant collagen and elastic fibers shown on histological examination on the Exoderm-treated side. There was no difference noted between the modalities in the effect on pigmentation. 
Conclusions: Exoderm peel was shown to be superior for the treatment of acne scarring, in some aspects, as compared with laser peeling after using simultaneous treatment with both modalities in the same patient. There was no difference between the modalities in the treatment of hyperpigmentation. 


Techniques for the treatment of acne scarring and hyper-pigmentation have improved over the past few years because of the introduction of new technologies and modification of the classic peeling agents. An objective comparison among the various methods is usually impossible because patients respond differently to the same method. The authors compared laser with phenol-based (Exoderm) peel in one patient with acne scars and hyperpigmentation by treating one half of the face with a laser, and the other half with Exoderm peel -- simultaneously. Biopsy samples were taken before and after treatment. 

Materials and Methods

A 41-year-old female patient with Fitzpatrick skin type IV-V was treated for extensive acne scarnng, dilated pores, and uneven hyperpigmentation of the forehead and cheeks (Figure 1). After providing a full explanation regarding the potential effects and risks of both the modified phenol-based (Exoderm) peel and CO2 laser resurfacing, the patient was offered the opportunity of undergoing simultaneous half-face treatment with Exoderm and half-face treatment with CO2 resurfacing. 

A pretreatment biopsy sample taken from the left preauricular area showed moderately sun-damaged skin with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, atrophic epidermis, uneven distribution of melanin in the epidermis, abundant melanophages, disrupted collagen and elastic bundles, and an increased amount of glycosaminoglycans in the upper dermis. 

Laser Resurfacing 
Before the procedure, the patient received intravenous morphine (5 mg) and prothiazine (15 mg). Infraorbital and mental nerve blocks as well as local infiltration anesthesia were performed using 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine on the right side of the face. The patient's face was degreased with ether. The procedure was performed with a CO2 Silktouch laser (Sharplan) using two passes at 16 to 18 J/cm2 fluence per pass with minimal overlap of the spots. A thick layer of Vaseline gauze was applied after the procedure (Figure 2). 

Exoderm Treatment 
At the same session, the left side of the face was scrubbed with acetone and the Exoderm solution was applied with a cotton applicator and rubbed onto the skin. The skin was then taped with impermeable, hypoallergic, zinc-oxidebased plastic tape, which was applied in strips of 3 to 4 cm in length in an overlapping fashion. After 24 hours, the tape mask was removed and the liquified epidermis was dislodged by a dry cotton applicator. The face was covered immediately with bismuth subgallate powder, which was kept on for 7 days (Figure 2). On the seventh day, the powder mask was dissolved with Vaseline. 

Results

After the procedure, the patient reported more burning discomfort on the side of laser resurfacing than on the side of Exoderm peeling. Five weeks after the procedure, an even erythema was seen on both sides of the face with no signs of hyperpigmentation. The improvement of the acne scars was more prominent on the Exoderm-treated side (Figure 3). Seven weeks after treatment, bilateral preauricular biopsy samples were obtained. Both sides showed even distribution of melanin in the epidermis and larger amounts of collagen in the form of compact parallel bundles oriented horizontally to the surface. Fine elastic fibers were more prominent on the Exoderm treated side. The Exoderm side showed a thinner epidermis, fewer rete pegs, less elastosis, and decrease in the number of sebaceous glands (Figure 4). 

Colloid iron stain showed a decreased amount of intracellular glycosaminoglycans. Two months after treatment, the laser-treated side began to show slight postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. At the ninth week, at the patient request, Exoderm peeling was performed on the previously treated laser side. Complete blending of the demarcation line between the two sides of the face was seen within 5 weeks (Figure 5). 

Discussion
The correction of acne scarring and hyperpigmentation continues to be a challenge for the practicing clinician. A variety of techniques have been developed, including traditional chemical peels, dermabrasion, and recently, laser assisted skin resurfacing. Nevertheless, in severe cases with deep tissue defects, none of these methods shows satisfactory results and meets the patient's expectations. In addition, the skin type limits the number of patients who can be treated with these techniques; associated hyperpigmentation is a frequent complication in dark-skinned patients. 

CO2 laser resurfacing has been introduced as a high-technology method of treatment for skin aging and defects. The procedure is now well established and includes pretreatment preparation of the skin by the Kligman formulation, systemic antiherpetic preventive treatment, deep sedation combined with local blocks, and tissue evaporation to remove skin irregularities.

Exoderm is a modified phenol-based peel composed of three groups of agents: (1) chemical agents such as crystallized and liquid phenol, resorcin, and citric acid; (2) a mixture of oils such as sesame, olive, glycerin, and croton; and (3) adjuvant components such as alcohol, septisol, distilled water, and mainly buffered tris. Because of the constant pH of the solution, controlled by the tris buffer, this formula blocks its own penetration at the upper reticular dermis. The phenomenon ensures that no scarring will occur. In contrast to laser resurfacing, in which the depth of penetration is surgeon-dependent (surgeon's own training and experience), the Exoderm solution "recognizes" the histological layer and even repeated applications do not augment the depth of penetration. This allows an effective and homogeneous correction of skin irregularities without the risk of posttreatment scarring. In contrast, the traditional Baker-Gordon method has delayed re-epithelialization, whereas Exoderm peeling is similar to other deep resurfacing techniques, with re-epithelialization in 7 days. No significant hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation was encountered with the use of Exoderm. 

Histological sections before and after treatment provide insight into the repair mechanisms. With both methods, histological changes of the treated skin are seen in the epidermal and dermal levels, with decreased and more evenly distributed melanin in the basal layer, increased amount of collagen and elastic fibers, and decreased amounts of intercellular glycosaminoglycans. All of these changes were more prominent on the Exoderm-treated side presumably because of the direct effect of the solution on collagen, elastic fiber synthesis, and the sebaceous glands. A decrease in the number of sebaceous glands was observed exclusively on the Exoderm-treated side (Figure 4). 

As opposed to the classical phenol peel, in which there is no difference in tissue reaction in comparison to laser resurfacing, Exoderm was shown to have more beneficial effects regarding the dermal reaction and pigmentary disturbances. The classic phenol peel causes arrest of melanin synthesis, thus inducing permanent hypopigmentation. This side effect does not occur with the Exoderm peel. The Exoderm formulation may impair the penetration of phenol into the melanocytes, which decreases the toxic effect on melanogenesis. Slight hypopigmentation rarely occurs, and this is appreciated by the dark- and olive-skinned patients. 

Conclusions
Exoderm peel is a novel method for skin rejuvenation and acne scar repair. It is superior in some respects to laser resurfacing, and is devoid of the classic phenol peel side effects. 


References

1. Ho C, Nguyen Q, Lowe NJ, et al. Laser resurfacing in pigmented skin. Dermatol Surg 1995;21:1035-1037. 
2. Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Satur NM, Tope WD. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photodamaged skin. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:395-402. 
3. Fintzi Y Exoderm-a novel, phenol-based peeling method resulting in improved safety. Am J Cosm Surg 1997;14:49-54. 
4. Fitzpatrick RE, Tope WD, Goldman MP Satur NM. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser, trichloracetic acid, BakerGordon phenol, and dermabrasion: a comparative clinical and histologic study of cutaneous resurfacing in a porcine model. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:469-471. 
5. Kligman AM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. Long-term histologic follow-up of phenol face peels. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:652. 
6. Stuzin JM, Baker TM, Kligman AM. Histologic effect of the high-energy pulsed COZ laser on photodamaged facial skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:2036-2050. 



Figure 1. Uneven pigmentation and postacne scarring before treatment. 

Figure 2.
Fourth day after treatment with Exoderm on the left side of the face, covered with bismuth subgallate mask, and laser resurfacing on the right side, covered with Vaseline. 

Figure 3. Five weeks after treatment there is slight erythema on both sides of the face. On the laser side (right), shallow scars are still seen. 


Figure 4.
Skin biopsies 7 weeks after treatment.
(A)Hematoxylin and eosin stain, x200. The Exoderm-treated side shows thinner epidermis, fewer rete pegs, less elastosis, and decrease in the number of sebaceous glands. (B)Hematoxylin and eosin stain, x200. The laser-treated side. 

Figure 5.
Eight weeks after Exoderm treatment of the laser-treated side (right). The scars are almost invisible on both sides of the face, and complete blending of the demarcation line can be noted. 
 
 
Home | Table of contents | Print this Page | Top
 IJCS / Year: 2001 / Volume 1 - Number 4 / Publications to EXODERM LIFT:
 
 
    Publisher IACS © All Rights Reserved Web Design by Web Systems